<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Podcast: Matthew Cavner from Vook.com on How the Vook is Changing Publishing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thecreativepenn.com/2009/10/24/podcast-matthew-cavner-from-vook-com-on-how-the-vook-is-changing-publishing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thecreativepenn.com/2009/10/24/podcast-matthew-cavner-from-vook-com-on-how-the-vook-is-changing-publishing/</link>
	<description>Writing, Self-Publishing, Print-on-Demand, Internet Sales and Marketing...for your book</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 01:44:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sam Caldwell</title>
		<link>http://www.thecreativepenn.com/2009/10/24/podcast-matthew-cavner-from-vook-com-on-how-the-vook-is-changing-publishing/comment-page-1/#comment-3078</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Caldwell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 21:12:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecreativepenn.com/?p=3482#comment-3078</guid>
		<description>Another good show and as usual very good technical execution. I am a bit perplexed by the chest thumping over the ‘Vook&#039;. One of the defining hallmarks of Web 2.0 is interactive, multimedia content. For example, I read news stories on CNN with the option to click on video, photos or audio content that extend and add to my reading experience. It would be very easy to implement a homemade ‘Vook’ using off the shelf HTML editors, webpage creation tools or even applications such as Keynote or Power Point. I really don’t see the need for special technologies to produce multimedia books. That said, I trust we will see future developments that utilize technologies not currently available insuring we never get a chance to be bored.
Keep up the great work.
Sam
iNetSynch.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another good show and as usual very good technical execution. I am a bit perplexed by the chest thumping over the ‘Vook&#8217;. One of the defining hallmarks of Web 2.0 is interactive, multimedia content. For example, I read news stories on CNN with the option to click on video, photos or audio content that extend and add to my reading experience. It would be very easy to implement a homemade ‘Vook’ using off the shelf HTML editors, webpage creation tools or even applications such as Keynote or Power Point. I really don’t see the need for special technologies to produce multimedia books. That said, I trust we will see future developments that utilize technologies not currently available insuring we never get a chance to be bored.<br />
Keep up the great work.<br />
Sam<br />
iNetSynch.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
