<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 5 Ideas Writers Can Use From Jungian Psychology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thecreativepenn.com/2009/09/16/ideas-writers-can-use-jungian-psychology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thecreativepenn.com/2009/09/16/ideas-writers-can-use-jungian-psychology/</link>
	<description>Adventures in Writing, Publishing and Book Marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:56:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barabeke</title>
		<link>http://www.thecreativepenn.com/2009/09/16/ideas-writers-can-use-jungian-psychology/comment-page-1/#comment-2733</link>
		<dc:creator>Barabeke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 01:29:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecreativepenn.com/?p=3138#comment-2733</guid>
		<description>First of all, thanks for using my fractal pic in your post.

I&#039;m quite impressed it was posted in an article about Jung. I&#039;m a big fan of Jung, and I&#039;ve read many of his books. But you probably didn&#039;t know it as there was no tag related to Jung on that pic. Plus the name of the blog, &quot;The Creative Penn&quot;. I was a copywriter in the past, and I still work in creative writing. Lots of coincidences! :)

I liked your article, I have a couple of notes:

- Regarding archetipes, I recommend to read &quot;The hero with 1000 faces&quot; by Joseph Campbell. An ensay who can be considered &quot;the mother of all stories&quot;. Without that book, Star Wars wouldn&#039;t exist.

- The collective unconscious is a part of the human psyche which is not easily accessible (nor recognizable) by most adults, including creative people.  I think that using that is quite a tricky tip to follow! Perhaps  what you wanted to suggest is to take inspiration from the work of others and find by comparison archetipical patterns you can use. If that&#039;s the case, ok it&#039;s useful. But in my opinion it&#039;s more useful to find those archetipes naturally as they flow. Reasoning and speculating on the work of others can be worth, but it&#039;s only when you interiorize the work of others that you can  make it yours, in anoter shape and in another greatness.

Barabeke

p.s.: I linked your article in my profile page:
http://www.flickr.com/people/barabeke/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all, thanks for using my fractal pic in your post.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m quite impressed it was posted in an article about Jung. I&#8217;m a big fan of Jung, and I&#8217;ve read many of his books. But you probably didn&#8217;t know it as there was no tag related to Jung on that pic. Plus the name of the blog, &#8220;The Creative Penn&#8221;. I was a copywriter in the past, and I still work in creative writing. Lots of coincidences! <img src='http://www.thecreativepenn.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I liked your article, I have a couple of notes:</p>
<p>- Regarding archetipes, I recommend to read &#8220;The hero with 1000 faces&#8221; by Joseph Campbell. An ensay who can be considered &#8220;the mother of all stories&#8221;. Without that book, Star Wars wouldn&#8217;t exist.</p>
<p>- The collective unconscious is a part of the human psyche which is not easily accessible (nor recognizable) by most adults, including creative people.  I think that using that is quite a tricky tip to follow! Perhaps  what you wanted to suggest is to take inspiration from the work of others and find by comparison archetipical patterns you can use. If that&#8217;s the case, ok it&#8217;s useful. But in my opinion it&#8217;s more useful to find those archetipes naturally as they flow. Reasoning and speculating on the work of others can be worth, but it&#8217;s only when you interiorize the work of others that you can  make it yours, in anoter shape and in another greatness.</p>
<p>Barabeke</p>
<p>p.s.: I linked your article in my profile page:<br />
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/people/barabeke/" rel="nofollow">http://www.flickr.com/people/barabeke/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anna</title>
		<link>http://www.thecreativepenn.com/2009/09/16/ideas-writers-can-use-jungian-psychology/comment-page-1/#comment-2725</link>
		<dc:creator>anna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 11:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecreativepenn.com/?p=3138#comment-2725</guid>
		<description>Using Jungian archetypes is a good idea. I&#039;m personally a big fan of &lt;a href=&quot;http://tvtropes.org/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;TV tropes&lt;/a&gt;, which collects a huge variety of archetypes in tv and literature for the perusal of all. Very addictive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Using Jungian archetypes is a good idea. I&#8217;m personally a big fan of <a href="http://tvtropes.org/" rel="nofollow">TV tropes</a>, which collects a huge variety of archetypes in tv and literature for the perusal of all. Very addictive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DaVida</title>
		<link>http://www.thecreativepenn.com/2009/09/16/ideas-writers-can-use-jungian-psychology/comment-page-1/#comment-2648</link>
		<dc:creator>DaVida</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 18:20:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecreativepenn.com/?p=3138#comment-2648</guid>
		<description>Thank you so much for this post! Very inspiring and so synchronistic to my current journey!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you so much for this post! Very inspiring and so synchronistic to my current journey!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

